(as datasources should be only used in repositories)
use coroutines instead RxJava for api calls triggered by MessageInputViewModel
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
The speaking state is still sent only through data channels, as it is
not currently handled by other clients when sent through signaling
messages.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Note that this implicitly send the current state to remote participants
when the local participant joins, as in that case all the remote
participants already in the call join from the point of view of the
local participant
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
This is not possible when Janus is used, as Janus only allows
broadcasting data channel messages to all the subscribers of the
publisher connection.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The LocalStateBroadcaster observes changes in the
LocalCallParticipantModel and notifies other participants in the call as
needed. Although it is created right before joining the call there is a
slim chance of the state changing before the local participant is
actually in the call, but even in that case other participants would not
be notified about the state due to the MessageSender depending on the
list of call participants / peer connections passed to it, which should
not be initialized before the local participant is actually in the call.
There is, however, a race condition that could cause participants to not
be added to the participant list if they join at the same time as the
local participant and a signaling message listing them but not the local
participant as in the call is received once the CallParticipantList was
created, but that is unrelated to the broadcaster and will be fixed
in another commit.
Currently only changes in the audio, speaking and video state are
notified, although in the future it should also notify about the nick,
the raised hand or any other state (but not one-time events, like
reactions). The notifications right now are sent only through data
channels, but at a later point they will be sent also through signaling
messages as needed.
Similarly, although right now it only notifies of changes in the state
it will also take care of notifying other participants about the current
state when they join the call (or the local participant joins).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
This is the counterpart of CallParticipantModel for the local
participant. For now it just stores whether audio and video are enabled
or not, and whether the local participant is speaking or not, but it
will be eventually extended with further properties.
It is also expected that the views, like the button with the microphone
state, will update themselves based on the model. Similarly the model
should be moved from the CallActivity to a class similar to
CallParticipant but for the local participant. In any case, all that is
something for the future; the immediate use of the model will be to know
when the local state changes to notify other participants.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Data channel messages are expected to be sent only to peer connections
with "video" type, which provide the audio and video tracks of the
participant (and, in fact, peer connections for screen shares do not
even have data channels enabled in the WebUI).
Note that this could change if at some point several audio/video tracks
are sent in the same peer connection, or if "speaking" messages are
added to screen shares, but that will be addressed if/when that happens.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
For now it just provides support for sending a data channel message to
all participants, so notifying all participants when the media is
toggled or the speaking status change can be directly refactored to use
it.
While it would have been fine to use a single class for both MCU and no
MCU they were split for easier and cleaner unit testing in future
stages.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
"hasMCU" (which has always been the wrong name, because it is an SFU
rather than an MCU, but it is wrong even in the signaling server so for
now the legacy name is kept) was set again and again whenever the call
participant list changed. Now it is set instead once its value is known,
that is, when it is known that the internal signaling server is used (as
no "MCU" is used in that case), or when the connection with the external
signaling server is established, as its supported features are not known
until then.
This change should have no effect in the usages of "hasMCU", as it is
used when the call participant list change, which will happen only after
joining the call in the signaling server, or when sending "isSpeaking"
and toggling media, in both cases guarded by "isConnectionEstablished",
which will be true only once "performCall" was called or if the call is
active with other participants.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The SDP constraints for publisher connections when the MCU is used were
set for all connections. Those constraints set "OfferToReceiveAudio" and
"OfferToReceiveVideo" to false, which disables receiving audio and video
when the local participant is the one sending the offer. Therefore,
audio and video was not received when the MCU was not used and the local
participant was the one initiating the connection.
The "OfferToReceiveXXX" configurations have no effect when set on an
answer (and thus are not even set, an empty MediaConstraints is used in
that case). However, when "OfferToReceiveVideo = false" is set the video
transceiver is explicitly stopped (which is used to avoid receiving
video when joining a call with audio only). Therefore, as
"OfferToReceiveVideo = false" was always set, video was never received
in subscriber connections when the MCU is used, or connections initiated
by the other peer when the MCU is not used.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The SDP constraints should be set when the MCU is used, but only for
publisher connections; receiver connections should use the general SDP
constraints.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When the data channel is not open yet data channel messages are queued
and then sent once opened. "onStateChange" is called from the WebRTC
signaling thread, while "send" can be called potentially from any
thread, so to send the data channel messages in the same order that they
were added new messages need to be enqueued until all the pending
messages have been sent. Otherwise, even if there is synchronization
already, it could happen that "onStateChange" was called but, before
getting the lock, "send" gets it and sends the new message before the
pending messages were sent.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Adding and disposing remote data channels is done from different
threads; they are added from the WebRTC signaling thread when
"onDataChannel" is called, while they can be disposed potentially from
any thread when "removePeerConnection" is called. To prevent race
conditions between them now both operations are synchronized.
However, as "onDataChannel" belongs to an inner class it needs to use a
synchronized statement with the outer class lock. This could still cause
a race condition if the same data channel was added again; this should
not happen, but it is handled just in case.
Moreover, once a data channel is disposed it can be no longer used, and
trying to call any of its methods throws an "IllegalStateException". Due
to this, as sending can be also done potentially from any thread, it
needs to be synchronized too with removing the peer connection.
State changes on data channels as well as receiving messages are also
done in the WebRTC signaling thread. State changes needs synchronization
as well, although receiving messages should not, as it does not directly
use the data channel (and it is assumed that using the buffers of a
disposed data channel is safe). Nevertheless a little check (which in
this case requires synchronization) was added to ignore the received
messages if the peer connection was removed already.
Finally, the synchronization added to "send" and "onStateChange" had the
nice side effect of making the pending data channel messages thread-safe
too, as before it could happen that a message was enqueued when the
pending messages were being sent, which caused a
"ConcurrentModificationException".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Getting the label is no longer possible once the data channel has been
disposed. This will help to make the observer thread-safe.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Data channel messages can be sent only when the data channel is open.
Otherwise the message is simply lost. Clients of the
PeerConnectionWrapper do not need to be aware of that detail or keep
track of whether the data channel was open already or not, so now data
channel messages sent before the data channel is open are queued and
sent once the data channel is opened.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Data channel messages are expected to be sent using the "status" data
channel that is locally created. However, if another data channel was
opened by the remote peer the reference to the "status" data channel was
overwritten with the new data channel, and messages were sent instead on
the remote data channel.
In current Talk versions that was not a problem, and the change makes no
difference either, because since the support for Janus 1.x was added
data channel messages are listened on all data channels, independently
of their label or whether they were created by the local or remote peer.
However, in older Talk versions this fixes a regression introduced with
the support for Janus 1.x. In those versions only messages coming from
the "status" or "JanusDataChannel" data channels were taken into
account. When Janus is not used the WebUI opens the legacy
"simplewebrtc" data channel, so that data channel may be the one used to
send data channel messages (if it is open after the "status" data
channel), but the messages received on that data channel were ignored by
the WebUI. Nevertheless, at this point this is more an academic problem
than a real world problem, as it is unlikely that there are many
Nextcloud servers with Talk < 16 and without HPB being used.
Independently of all that, when the peer connection is removed only the
"status" data channel is disposed, but none of the remote data channels
are. This is just a variation of an already existing bug (the last open
data channel was the one disposed due to being the last saved reference,
but the rest were not) and it will be fixed in another commit.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The legacy name was a bit strange, so now it is renamed to just "send"
as the parameter type ("DataChannelMessage") gives enough context.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
This implicitly fixes trying to send the initial state on the latest
remote data channel found (which is the one stored in the "dataChannel"
attribute of the "PeerConnectionWrapper") when any other existing data
channel changes its status to open. Nevertheless, as all this will be
reworked, no unit test was added for it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Log methods are static, so they can not be mocked using Mockito.
Although it might be possible to use PowerMockito a dummy implementation
was added instead, as Log uses are widespread and it is not something
worth mocking anyway.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The PeerConnectionWrapper does not need to be injected in the
application, nor the Context needs to be injected in the
PeerConnectionWrapper. This all seems to be leftovers from the past, and
removing them would ease adding unit tests for the
PeerConnectionWrapper.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Reiner <foss@christian-reiner.info>
Themed the PlaybackSpeedControl + Work around onBind bug
Signed-off-by: rapterjet2004 <juliuslinus1@gmail.com>
also:
create ChatMessageUtils as helper for the ViewHolders in this case.
Could help to avoid duplicated code until there is a clear inheritance solution.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
However this is only possible for the conversation info.
In other parts, the info if a guest changed the name or not is not available (like in the chat or in autocomplete)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
knowing if a guest did not change it's name is not possible at this point, so we also show the letter "G" if it's name is guest
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
objectId would be some long random string for email guests. displaying them would not make sense. It's also not done on web.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
Open notification settings when click on warning
Also, still offer to enable notifications and disable battery optimization on first install
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
Also add an option to not show the hint, when user doesn't want to ignore battery optimization.
Only show these features when gplay services are available. Otherwise don't show them as it would pretend notifications would be possible without gplay.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
followup to PR #4439
Exception java.lang.NullPointerException:
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.MessageInputFragment.handleMessageQueue (MessageInputFragment.kt:251)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.MessageInputFragment.access$handleMessageQueue (MessageInputFragment.kt:82)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.MessageInputFragment$initObservers$4$1.invokeSuspend (MessageInputFragment.kt:192)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.MessageInputFragment$initObservers$4$1.invoke (Unknown Source:12)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.MessageInputFragment$initObservers$4$1.invoke (Unknown Source:8)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__TransformKt$onEach$$inlined$unsafeTransform$1$2.emit (Emitters.kt:219)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__ChannelsKt.emitAllImpl$FlowKt__ChannelsKt (Channels.kt:33)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__ChannelsKt.access$emitAllImpl$FlowKt__ChannelsKt (Channels.kt:1)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__ChannelsKt$emitAllImpl$1.invokeSuspend (Unknown Source:14)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith (ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run (DispatchedTask.kt:104)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:938)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loopOnce (Looper.java:241)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:342)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:8128)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:583)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:1045)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
As the number of provided emojis grew, there was a bug that only one emoji was shown.
Putting all 12 emojis would have been too close, so it's implemented to scroll them horizontally
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
however i was not able to see onDestroy being executed.
anyway, disposables won't be necessary when coroutine is used.
also: remove a useless outdated log line
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
The request seems to cause problems so blockingSubscribe doesn't seem to be a good choice here. This commit will replace blockingSubscribe by subscribe and modify the related code in order to be executed when the request succeeds.
The root cause why the request seems to cause problems may have to be analyzed further.
I was not able to reproduce the ANR without this PR, however the following error was reported on gplay console very often!:
at jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park (Native method)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park (LockSupport.java:341)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode.block (AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:506)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.unmanagedBlock (ForkJoinPool.java:3466)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.managedBlock (ForkJoinPool.java:3437)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await (AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1623)
at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take (LinkedBlockingQueue.java:435)
at io.reactivex.internal.operators.observable.ObservableBlockingSubscribe.subscribe (ObservableBlockingSubscribe.java:56)
at io.reactivex.Observable.blockingSubscribe (Observable.java:5552)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.setupWebsocket (ChatActivity.kt:2445)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.joinRoomWithPassword (ChatActivity.kt:2402)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.initObservers$lambda$13 (ChatActivity.kt:594)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.$r8$lambda$QKH5JCFLmCzRMlSJ-EV-m4IW5ig (unavailable)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$$ExternalSyntheticLambda38.invoke (D8$$SyntheticClass)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$sam$androidx_lifecycle_Observer$0.onChanged (unavailable:2)
at androidx.lifecycle.LiveData.considerNotify (LiveData.java:133)
at androidx.lifecycle.LiveData.dispatchingValue (LiveData.java:151)
at androidx.lifecycle.LiveData.setValue (LiveData.java:309)
at androidx.lifecycle.MutableLiveData.setValue (MutableLiveData.java:50)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.viewmodels.ChatViewModel.getCapabilities (ChatViewModel.kt:240)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$1$1.invokeSuspend (ChatActivity.kt:553)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$1$1.invoke (unavailable:8)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$1$1.invoke (unavailable:4)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__TransformKt$onEach$$inlined$unsafeTransform$1$2.emit (Emitters.kt:219)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__ErrorsKt$catchImpl$2.emit (Errors.kt:154)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__TransformKt$onEach$$inlined$unsafeTransform$1$2.emit (Emitters.kt:220)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SharedFlowImpl.collect$suspendImpl (SharedFlow.kt:392)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SharedFlowImpl$collect$1.invokeSuspend (unavailable:15)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith (ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run (DispatchedTask.kt:104)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:938)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loopOnce (Looper.java:210)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:299)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:8168)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Native method)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:556)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:1037)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
As remote server is empty instead null when not available, the check was also true when no remote server was in use.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
when adapter has no items adapter!!.items[1].item will crash with IndexOutOfBoundsException
This could happen e.g. when chat history is cleared.
error was:
Exception java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 1 out of bounds for length 0
at jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.outOfBounds (Preconditions.java:64)
at jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.outOfBoundsCheckIndex (Preconditions.java:70)
at jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.checkIndex (Preconditions.java:266)
at java.util.Objects.checkIndex (Objects.java:359)
at java.util.ArrayList.get (ArrayList.java:434)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.processMessagesFromTheFuture (ChatActivity.kt:2666)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.access$processMessagesFromTheFuture (ChatActivity.kt:209)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$12$1.invokeSuspend (ChatActivity.kt:875)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$12$1.invoke (Unknown Source:8)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$12$1.invoke (Unknown Source:4)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__TransformKt$onEach$$inlined$unsafeTransform$1$2.emit (Emitters.kt:219)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__ErrorsKt$catchImpl$2.emit (Errors.kt:154)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__TransformKt$onEach$$inlined$unsafeTransform$1$2.emit (Emitters.kt:220)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SharedFlowImpl.collect$suspendImpl (SharedFlow.kt:392)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SharedFlowImpl$collect$1.invokeSuspend (Unknown Source:15)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith (ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run (DispatchedTask.kt:104)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:942)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loopOnce (Looper.java:201)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:288)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:7932)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:548)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:942)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
When messages were sorted out in handleSystemMessages it can happen that the chatMessageList is empty. Because setUnreadMessageMarker accessed chatMessageList[0] this crashed.
This can happen e.g. when only a reaction to a chat message was made before opening the chat.
Exception java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Empty list doesn't contain element at index 0.
at kotlin.collections.EmptyList.get (Collections.kt:37)
at kotlin.collections.EmptyList.get (Collections.kt:25)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.setUnreadMessageMarker (ChatActivity.kt:2691)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.processMessagesFromTheFuture (ChatActivity.kt:2651)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.access$processMessagesFromTheFuture (ChatActivity.kt:209)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$12$1.invokeSuspend (ChatActivity.kt:875)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$12$1.invoke (Unknown Source:8)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$12$1.invoke (Unknown Source:4)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__TransformKt$onEach$$inlined$unsafeTransform$1$2.emit (Emitters.kt:219)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__ErrorsKt$catchImpl$2.emit (Errors.kt:154)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__TransformKt$onEach$$inlined$unsafeTransform$1$2.emit (Emitters.kt:220)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SharedFlowImpl.collect$suspendImpl (SharedFlow.kt:392)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SharedFlowImpl$collect$1.invokeSuspend (Unknown Source:15)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith (ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run (DispatchedTask.kt:104)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:942)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loopOnce (Looper.java:226)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:313)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:8762)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:604)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:1067)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
currentConversation was not yet initialized in ChatActivity.
In the future this may be better handled via StateFlows. For now it's solved via arguments.
Without the fix, this NPE appeared:
Exception java.lang.RuntimeException:
at android.app.ActivityThread.performResumeActivity (ActivityThread.java:4768)
at android.app.ActivityThread.handleResumeActivity (ActivityThread.java:4801)
at android.app.servertransaction.ResumeActivityItem.execute (ResumeActivityItem.java:54)
at android.app.servertransaction.ActivityTransactionItem.execute (ActivityTransactionItem.java:45)
at android.app.servertransaction.TransactionExecutor.executeLifecycleState (TransactionExecutor.java:176)
at android.app.servertransaction.TransactionExecutor.execute (TransactionExecutor.java:97)
at android.app.ActivityThread$H.handleMessage (ActivityThread.java:2215)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:106)
at android.os.Looper.loopOnce (Looper.java:346)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:475)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:7889)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:548)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:1009)
Caused by java.lang.NullPointerException:
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.MessageInputFragment.onResume (MessageInputFragment.kt:146)
at androidx.fragment.app.Fragment.performResume (Fragment.java:3180)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentStateManager.resume (FragmentStateManager.java:606)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentStateManager.moveToExpectedState (FragmentStateManager.java:285)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentStore.moveToExpectedState (FragmentStore.java:113)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.moveToState (FragmentManager.java:1433)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.dispatchStateChange (FragmentManager.java:2977)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager.dispatchResume (FragmentManager.java:2909)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentController.dispatchResume (FragmentController.java:285)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentActivity.onResumeFragments (FragmentActivity.java:334)
at androidx.fragment.app.FragmentActivity.onPostResume (FragmentActivity.java:323)
at androidx.appcompat.app.AppCompatActivity.onPostResume (AppCompatActivity.java:245)
at android.app.Activity.performResume (Activity.java:8215)
at android.app.ActivityThread.performResumeActivity (ActivityThread.java:4758)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
For archived conversations, require "-v2".
This is done because on server api, "archived-conversations" was already released for 20.0.2 by mistake which should have only be done for 20.1
As it's planned to release android talk 20.0.3 with a fresh master state, the archived conversations feature must be hidden manually, This is done by required "-v2".
Either it's served as this in the future or it can be removed for the 20.1.0 release.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
only more complex checks should be made in CapabilitiesUtil, just checking a capability should be done directly via hasSpreedFeatureCapability
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
this will set NOT NULL and DEFAULT 0 to hasArchived column
Otherwise there would be an error when updating from the previous DB version:
IllegalStateException: Migration didn't properly handle: Conversations(com.nextcloud.talk.data.database.model.ConversationEntity)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
replace com.nextcloud.ui.popupbubble.PopupBubble with MaterialButton.
com.nextcloud.ui.popupbubble.PopupBubble was forked from
https://github.com/webianks/PopupBubble
which is quite outdated.
com.nextcloud.ui.popupbubble.PopupBubble is still used in ConversationsListActivity but there it should also be removed.
Removing this recycler view stuff will also help a bit to switch to JetpackCompose
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
this commit will avoid to fail to show messages in adapter. This was caused by the usage of
messagesListAdapter.deleteById("-1");
in UnreadNoticeMessageViewHolder.
The bug seems to exist in the past already but was never reported (Sometimes, when receiving a lot of messages it could happen that some message in between is not shown in UI). However with recent changes after release 20.0.2 the bug appeared more often.
The root cause was not analyzed, but the handling was modified in general as the unread marker behavior was never really good.
By not using deleteById but replace it with new unread marker logic, the bug of disappearing messages is solved and the unread messages marker behavior is improved.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
When the message applies to all participants the property is all in
lower case. The comparison is case sensitive, so the message was ignored
and the call was not left by the Talk Android app.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
"IN_CONVERSATION" was set when the activity was created and "state" in
the intent extras had the value "resume". However, there is no "state"
extra set by default in Android intents, it should be explicitly set,
but as it is not set anywhere in Talk Android code that would make it
dead code and safe to remove.
Moreover, the connection to the call should be initialized again in any
case rather than resumed when "onCreate" is called, as it is likely that
any previous connection would have been ended if the previous activity
instance was destroyed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
avoid NPE:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.data.network.OfflineFirstChatRepository.getCappedMessagesAmountOfChatBlock(OfflineFirstChatRepository.kt:186)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.data.network.OfflineFirstChatRepository.access$getCappedMessagesAmountOfChatBlock(OfflineFirstChatRepository.kt:43)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.data.network.OfflineFirstChatRepository$loadInitialMessages$1.invokeSuspend(OfflineFirstChatRepository.kt:162)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
Mistake was, that the conversations from DB and sync could differ due to values.
E.g. when a user changed the status, the conversations from DB and sync would differ. So there were conversations (+related messages&chatBlocks) deleted sometimes.
This caused bugs that when entering a chat, all data was loaded again.
In the previous implementation (before this PR), this error was only visible in the UI when you were offline (in this case, nothing was displayed!).
To fix the bug, only the internalId's are compared.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
If conversation has a newer message id than DB then an online request is necessary
If conversation has an older message id than DB then an online request is not necessary (this could happen when updating of DB is implemented for push notification, not yet done).
If conversation has the same message id like DB than request can be skipped
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
Decrease message limit for retries of message loading
make it possible to add any amount (up to 100) of messages to UI for initial loading.
add logging
only make initial request for chat messages when newest message from DB is not equal the lastReadMessage that is offered by the conversation
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
Hide search feature if room is federated.
Also, for conversation list the check for federation inside isUnifiedSearchAvailable makes no sense.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
This test respects different API versions and checks if default values are set as expected.
- remove deprecated+unused methods
- remove comments
- remove unnecessary double-bang operator
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
Otherwise, following crash happened, as it was tried to deal with the empty url:
2024-09-24 15:10:30.719 17765-17765 WebSocketInstance com.nextcloud.talk2 D restartWebSocket: /spreed
2024-09-24 15:10:30.722 17765-17765 System.err com.nextcloud.talk2 W java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Expected URL scheme 'http' or 'https' but no scheme was found for /spree...
2024-09-24 15:10:30.723 17765-17765 System.err com.nextcloud.talk2 W at okhttp3.HttpUrl$Builder.parse$okhttp(HttpUrl.kt:1261)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
On gplay console the following NPE was reported for the line
participantPermissions = ParticipantPermissions(spreedCapabilities, currentConversation!!)
E FATAL EXCEPTION: main
Process: com.nextcloud.talk2, PID: 6626
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.initObservers$lambda$13(ChatActivity.kt:583)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.$r8$lambda$QKH5JCFLmCzRMlSJ-EV-m4IW5ig(Unknown Source:0)
which seems that currentConversation was null. If it would have been spreedCapabilities, then the error would have been thrown in the line before..
A reason MAY BE that the observer is triggered before setData on the ViewModel is executed.
While this fix is just not executing code when currentConversation is null, it's unsure if it will follow up problems (like an empty chat) or if the observer is triggered another time when currentConversation is available.
So it's just a hotfix.
To improve the situation in the long term, we should move more logic to viewModel and only use Flow instead to mix it with LiveData.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
reported issue on gplay console was:
Exception kotlin.UninitializedPropertyAccessException: lateinit property spreedCapabilities has not been initialized
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.getSpreedCapabilities (ChatActivity.kt:284)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.processExpiredMessages (ChatActivity.kt:2536)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.access$processExpiredMessages (ChatActivity.kt:204)
at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$10$1.invokeSuspend (ChatActivity.kt:820)
This is just a hotfix while hoping processExpiredMessages is executed again while spreedCapabilities are available.
To improve the situation in the long term, we should move more logic to viewModel and have better control over sequence of actions.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
After 30 seconds (when the capabilities were updated) the call buttons of federated conversations were removed (this was done back then when fed calls were not implemented).
However this happened not always because of the check
"if (this::spreedCapabilities.isInitialized) {...."
It seems this check sometimes is false when it's supposed to be true. This has be to further investigated and has to be be simplified/improved by a cleaner architecture.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
The messageInputFragment was hidden by checkShowMessageInputView(), but it was immediately shown again by checkLobbyState()
This fix will execute checkShowMessageInputView() inside checkLobbyState() in the correct order.
Additionally, the check
checkLobbyState()
has to be already executed in
GetCapabilitiesInitialLoadState
as well as
checkShowCallButtons()
Otherwise the expected behavior would only be set after 30 seconds.
An improvemnt for the future must be to improve the capabilities handling.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
With server version 23.0.12 it happened that the chat did not load because values were null. Now default values in json model are set (because that's easier than changing the entity).
Additionally a check was added in CallActivity that a callStartTime of 0 would not be used (but it should not be used anyway if it would be 0 because then capability should also not be available).
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
As build script was not able to push to master, it failed and next time it tried to build the same version again.
Thats why Google complained the apk already exists.
The bot was now changed to have admin permissions. So this commit will bump the version number manually and in the next runs everything should work again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
Otherwise the WebSocket configuration and session clashes with the one
from the CallActivity, which already uses the federated settings.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Starting with Talk 20 the signaling messages that provide updates to the
participants ("participants->update" in the external signaling server,
"usersInRoom" in the internal signaling server) now include "actorType"
and "actorId" properties for each participant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The "federation" values are used by the external signaling server to
establish a connection with the remote signaling server in a federated
room.
For now this is applied only in calls; when the room is joined in the
chat view again after a call it will still join it in the old way,
without federation properties, which will cause the connection with the
remote signaling server to be closed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Starting with Talk 20 the signaling settings include a "federation"
property that provide the values needed to join a federated room in the
external signaling settings. The "federation" property is specific to
each conversation, and it will be returned although empty for
non-federated conversations.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
add delay between sending of queued messages to increase the chance they are received on server in the correct order. This is not the best solution though as it blocks the UI a bit so may have to be improved!
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
Otherwise, it resulted in a lot of flickering because _lastCommonReadFlow was emitted every 500ms. And anyway if we know we are offline or paused then it doesn't make sense to execute the sync method.
chain which caused the flickering was:
updateUiForLastCommonRead (_lastCommonReadFlow) -> updateReadStatusOfAllMessages - notifyDataSetChanged -> onBindViewHolder -> IncomingLinkPreviewMessageViewHolder
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
In dark mode, the call buttons looked like disabled otherwise.
There is still the 3-dots menu next to the call icons like disabled for dark and light mode. But this is a different bug that needs to be fixed in another branch(could not find the reason for now).
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
same for swipeRefreshLayoutView?.isRefreshing
If searchHelper would be null (= when UnifiedSearch is not available) then going back to conversations list view would not trigger to check to show for unread mentions bubble. This fix will make it independent from searchHelper.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
no idea how this happens, however this was
reported via gplay pre launch report for 20.0.0RC1
("Detected on 10 devices during testing"):
Exception java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to invoke virtual method 'java.lang.String com.nextcloud.talk.data.user.model.User.getBaseUrl()' on a null object reference
at com.nextcloud.talk.activities.BaseActivity.startActivity (BaseActivity.kt:240)
at com.nextcloud.talk.account.ServerSelectionActivity.showVisitProvidersInfo$lambda$5 (ServerSelectionActivity.kt:206)
at com.nextcloud.talk.account.ServerSelectionActivity.$r8$lambda$pjpPT-LQbGLSCJPXeRE8IJvpLIE
at com.nextcloud.talk.account.ServerSelectionActivity$$ExternalSyntheticLambda0.onClick (D8$$SyntheticClass)
at android.view.View.performClick (View.java:7506)
at android.view.View.performClickInternal (View.java:7483)
at android.view.View.-$$Nest$mperformClickInternal
at android.view.View$PerformClick.run (View.java:29335)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:942)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:99)
at androidx.test.espresso.base.Interrogator.loopAndInterrogate (Interrogator.java:10)
at androidx.test.espresso.base.UiControllerImpl.loopUntil (UiControllerImpl.java:7)
at androidx.test.espresso.base.UiControllerImpl.loopUntil (UiControllerImpl.java:1)
at androidx.test.espresso.base.UiControllerImpl.injectMotionEvent (UiControllerImpl.java:5)
at androidx.test.espresso.action.MotionEvents.sendUp (MotionEvents.java:6)
at androidx.test.espresso.action.MotionEvents.sendUp (MotionEvents.java:1)
at androidx.test.espresso.action.Tap.sendSingleTap (Tap.java:5)
at androidx.test.espresso.action.Tap.-$$Nest$smsendSingleTap
at androidx.test.espresso.action.Tap$1.sendTap (Tap.java:1)
at androidx.test.espresso.action.GeneralClickAction.perform (GeneralClickAction.java:4)
at androidx.test.espresso.ViewInteraction$SingleExecutionViewAction.perform (ViewInteraction.java:2)
at androidx.test.espresso.ViewInteraction.doPerform (ViewInteraction.java:23)
at androidx.test.espresso.ViewInteraction.-$$Nest$mdoPerform
at androidx.test.espresso.ViewInteraction$1.call (ViewInteraction.java:6)
at androidx.test.espresso.ViewInteraction$1.call (ViewInteraction.java:1)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run (FutureTask.java:264)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:942)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loopOnce (Looper.java:201)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:288)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:7898)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:548)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:936)
If baseUrl is really missing this may lead to followup issues, however this maybe only 'happens' in gplay pre launch report without any real world scenario. A best solution may be to make baseUrl not nullable, but don't want to do this on short term before release..
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
...for ConversationCreationActivity and ContactsActivityCompose
just a quick fix, this may not be the best solution!
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
