packages: Reword release tarball vs repo snapshot difference

Besides Rainer's suggestion, also use a vague "not stored in the
repository" instead of the over-precise "generated": there are also
vendored external source copies (as Git submodules or manually embedded
during Release Engineering, for example the gnulib copies in many
GNU packages); and maybe other cases.

Suggested-by: Rainer Fiebig <jrf@mailbox.org>
This commit is contained in:
Xi Ruoyao 2024-12-11 20:31:08 +08:00
parent 6fa6a4f3ce
commit eb35057724
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: ACAAD20E19E710E3

View File

@ -22,8 +22,9 @@
<para>For some packages, the release tarball and the (Git or SVN) <para>For some packages, the release tarball and the (Git or SVN)
repository snapshot tarball for that release may be published with repository snapshot tarball for that release may be published with
similar file names. A release tarball contains generated files (for similar or even identical file names. But the release tarball may contain
example, a <command>configure</command> script generated by some files which are essential despite not stored in the repository
(for example, a <command>configure</command> script generated by
<command>autoconf</command>), in addition to the contents of the <command>autoconf</command>), in addition to the contents of the
corresponding repository snapshot. The book uses release tarballs corresponding repository snapshot. The book uses release tarballs
whenever possible. Using a repository snapshot instead of a release whenever possible. Using a repository snapshot instead of a release