arm64: start branch

This commit is contained in:
Xi Ruoyao 2022-08-24 22:35:14 +08:00
parent 5353a1948f
commit e5263d535f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: ACAAD20E19E710E3
2 changed files with 14 additions and 31 deletions

View File

@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ esac
full_date="$month $day$suffix, $year"
sha="$(git describe --abbrev=1)"
rev=$(echo "$sha" | sed 's/-g[^-]*$//')
rev=arm64-$(echo "$sha" | sed 's/-g[^-]*$//')
version="$rev"
versiond="$rev-systemd"

View File

@ -10,41 +10,24 @@
<title>LFS Target Architectures</title>
<para>The primary target architectures of LFS are the AMD/Intel x86 (32-bit)
and x86_64 (64-bit) CPUs. On the other hand, the instructions in this book are
also known to work, with some modifications, with the Power PC and ARM CPUs. To
build a system that utilizes one of these CPUs, the main prerequisite, in
addition to those on the next page, is an existing Linux system such as an
earlier LFS installation, Ubuntu, Red Hat/Fedora, SuSE, or other distribution
that targets the architecture that you have. Also note that a 32-bit
distribution can be installed and used as a host system on a 64-bit AMD/Intel
computer.</para>
<para>The target architectures of this LFS edition are ARM64 (sometimes
called AArch64) CPUs. On the other hand, the instructions in this book may
work on 32-bit ARM CPUs with some modifications. To build a system that
utilizes one of these CPUs, the main prerequisite, in addition to those on
the next page, is an existing Linux system such as an earlier LFS
installation, Ubuntu, Red Hat/Fedora, SuSE, or other distribution that
targets the architecture that you have.</para>
<para>For building LFS, the gain of building on a 64-bit system
compared to a 32-bit system is minimal.
For example, in a test build of LFS-9.1 on a Core i7-4790 CPU based system,
using 4 cores, the following statistics were measured:</para>
<screen><computeroutput>Architecture Build Time Build Size
32-bit 239.9 minutes 3.6 GB
64-bit 233.2 minutes 4.4 GB</computeroutput></screen>
<para>As you can see, on the same hardware, the 64-bit build is only 3% faster
and is 22% larger than the 32-bit build. If you plan to use LFS as a LAMP
server, or a firewall, a 32-bit CPU may be largely sufficient. On the other
hand, several packages in BLFS now need more than 4GB of RAM to be built
and/or to run, so that if you plan to use LFS as a desktop, the LFS authors
recommend building on a 64-bit system.</para>
<para>The default 64-bit build that results from LFS is considered a
<quote>pure</quote> 64-bit system. That is, it supports 64-bit executables
only. Building a <quote>multi-lib</quote> system requires compiling many
<para>The build results from this LFS edition is considered a
<quote>pure</quote> 64-bit system. That is, it supports 64-bit executables
only. Building a <quote>multi-lib</quote> system requires compiling many
applications twice, once for a 32-bit system and once for a 64-bit system.
This is not directly supported in LFS because it would interfere with the
educational objective of providing the instructions needed for a
straightforward base Linux system. Some LFS/BLFS editors maintain a fork
of LFS for multilib, which is accessible at <ulink
url="https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~thomas/multilib/index.html"/>. But it
is an advanced topic.</para>
url="https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~thomas/multilib/index.html"/>. But
the multilib edition is for x86_64, and multilib is an advanced topic
anyway.</para>
</sect1>