Add some clarifying text re test suites.

git-svn-id: http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@2912 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689
This commit is contained in:
Greg Schafer 2003-10-01 11:14:11 +00:00
parent a6ab2e7cb7
commit bd10d48248
2 changed files with 8 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ variables that override the default optimization flags.</para>
<para><screen><userinput>make </userinput></screen></para>
<para>Test the results (nothing should fail here):</para>
<para>Test the results (there should be no unexpected failures here, expected
failures are fine):</para>
<para><screen><userinput>make check</userinput></screen></para>

View File

@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ current GCC-3.3.1 should look on i686-pc-linux-gnu, see
<para>Note that the results contain:</para>
<screen>* 1 XPASS (unexpected pass) for g++
* 1 FAIL for g++
* 1 FAIL (unexpected failure) for g++
* 2 FAIL for gcc
* 26 XPASS's for libstdc++</screen>
@ -148,6 +148,11 @@ model (which may be applicable if for instance you were using Newlibc, Sun-libc
or whatever libc). The libstdc++ test suite is apparently expecting the
"generic" model, hence those tests are not always expected to pass.</para>
<para>Unexpected failures often cannot be avoided. The GCC developers are
usually aware of them but haven't yet gotten around to fixing them. In short,
unless your results are vastly different from those at the above URL, it is safe
to continue on.</para>
<para>And finally install the package:</para>
<para><screen><userinput>make install</userinput></screen></para>