From b4f6bac08c9d1ee3bf4baa8a7445596e245a0075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Schafer Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 01:31:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Typo fix. git-svn-id: http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@3039 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689 --- chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml b/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml index 20f5ddc5c..5cca86e2b 100644 --- a/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml +++ b/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ recompile this one library, instead of having to recompile all the programs that make use of the improved function. If dynamic linking has several advantages, why then do we statically link -the first two packages in this chapter? The reasonsare threefold: historical, +the first two packages in this chapter? The reasons are threefold: historical, educational, and technical. Historical, because earlier versions of LFS statically linked every program in this chapter. Educational, because knowing the difference is useful. Technical, because we gain an element of independence