Text update

git-svn-id: http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@360 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689
This commit is contained in:
Gerard Beekmans 2001-03-23 03:27:23 +00:00
parent 4848808d6c
commit abdeaad6a7

View File

@ -3,36 +3,21 @@
<para>
Most programs and libraries by default are compiled with debugging
symbols and optimizing level 2 (gcc options -g and -O2) and are compiled
for a specific CPU. On Intel platforms software is compiled for i386
processors by default. If a user doesn't wish to run software on other
machines other than his own, he might want to change the default
compiler options so that they will be compiled with a higher
optimization level, no debugging symbols and generate code for his
specific architecture. Let me first explain what debugging symbols
are.
symbols (gcc option -g) Let me explain what these debugging symbols
are and why you may not want them.
</para>
<para>
A program compiled with debugging symbols means a user can run a program or
library through a debugger and the debugger's output will be user friendlier.
These debugging symbols also enlarge the program or library significantly.
library through a debugger and the debugger's output will be user
friendly. These debugging symbols also enlarge the program or library
significantly.
</para>
<para>
To remove debugging symbols from a binary (must be an a.out or ELF binary)
run <userinput>strip --strip-debug filename</userinput>. A user can use wild
cards
if he needs to strip debugging symbols from multiple files (use something like
strip --strip-debug $LFS/usr/bin/*). Another, easier, options is just
not to compile programs with debugging symbols. Most people will probably
never use a debugger on software, so by leaving those symbols out
a lot of diskspace can be saved.
</para>
<para>
Before someone wonders if these debugging symbols would make a big difference,
here are some statistics:
Before you start wondering whether these debugging symbols really make a
big difference, here are some statistics. Use them to draw your own
conclusion.
</para>
<itemizedlist>
@ -58,12 +43,20 @@ here are some statistics:
</itemizedlist>
<para>
Sizes may vary depending on which compiler was used and which C library
Sizes vary depending on which compiler was used and which C library
version was used to link dynamic programs against, but results will be
similar if a user compares programs with and without debugging symbols. After
similar if you compare programs with and without debugging symbols. After
I was done with this chapter and stripped all debugging symbols from all LFS
binaries and libraries I regained a little over 102 MB of disk space. Quite
the difference.
binaries I regained a little over 102 MB of disk space. Quite the difference.
</para>
<para>
To remove debugging symbols from a binary (must be an a.out or ELF
binary) run <userinput>strip --strip-debug filename</userinput>. Wild cards
can be used to strip debugging symbols from multiple files (use something
like <userinput>strip --strip-debug $LFS/usr/bin/*</userinput>).
Most people will probably never use a debugger on software, so by
removing those symbols a lot of diskspace can be regained.
</para>
</sect1>