Minor adjustments to the 'Lock-in' section.

git-svn-id: http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@2834 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689
This commit is contained in:
Alex Gronenwoud 2003-09-17 22:00:04 +00:00
parent 552a690b44
commit 783c041149

View File

@ -38,32 +38,32 @@ all in. Or you can edit the specs file by hand if you want to: just replace
system have found their way into GCC's private include dir. This can happen
because of GCC's "fixincludes" process which runs as part of the GCC build.
We'll explain more about this further on in this chapter. For now, run the
following commands to eliminate this possibility.</para>
following commands to eliminate this possibility:</para>
<para><screen><userinput>rm -f /tools/lib/gcc-lib/*/*/include/{pthread.h,bits/sigthread.h}</userinput></screen></para>
<caution><para>It is imperative at this point to stop and ensure that the
basic functionality of the new toolchain is working as expected. We are going
to perform a simple sanity check:</para>
<caution><para>It is imperative at this point to stop and ensure that the basic
functions (compiling and linking) of the new toolchain are working as expected.
For this we are going to perform a simple sanity check:</para>
<para><screen><userinput>echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
gcc dummy.c
readelf -l a.out | grep ': /tools'</userinput></screen></para>
<para>If everything is working correctly, the output of the last command will
be:</para>
<para>If everything is working correctly, there should be no errors, and the
output of the last command will be:</para>
<para><screen>[Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
</screen></para>
<para>If you did not receive the output as shown above then something is
<para>If you did not receive the output as shown above, then something is
seriously wrong. You will need to investigate and retrace your steps to find
out where the problem is and correct it. There is no point in continuing
until this is done. Most likely, something went wrong with the specs file
until this is done. Most likely something went wrong with the specs file
amendment above. Note especially that <filename>/tools/lib</filename> appears
as the prefix of our dynamic linker. Of course, if you are working on a
platform where the name of the dynamic linker is something other than
<filename>ld-linux.so.2</filename> then the output will be slightly different.
<filename>ld-linux.so.2</filename>, then the output will be slightly different.
</para>
<para>Once you are satisfied that all is well, clean up the test files:</para>
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ platform where the name of the dynamic linker is something other than
<para><screen><userinput>rm dummy.c a.out</userinput></screen></para>
</caution>
<para>This completes the installation of the self-contained toolchain, which
<para>This completes the installation of the self-contained toolchain, and it
can now be used to build the rest of the temporary tools.</para>
</sect1>