From 65f0a28feb4e52806551e4b00274300d4f2126ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:31:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: Document test failure with non-ext fs

Someone building LFS on btrfs reported this, and I can reproduce.
---
 chapter08/e2fsprogs.xml | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/chapter08/e2fsprogs.xml b/chapter08/e2fsprogs.xml
index d99922610..6f93dc99e 100644
--- a/chapter08/e2fsprogs.xml
+++ b/chapter08/e2fsprogs.xml
@@ -93,9 +93,12 @@ cd       build</userinput></screen>
 
 <screen><userinput remap="test">make check</userinput></screen>
 
-    <!-- https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/issues/134 -->
+    <!-- https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/issues/134
+         https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/issues/158 -->
     <para>One test named <filename>m_assume_storage_prezeroed</filename>
-    is known to fail.</para>
+    is known to fail.  Another test named <filename>m_rootdir_acl</filename>
+    is known to fail if the file system used for the LFS system is not
+    <systemitem class='filesystem'>ext4</systemitem>.</para>
 
 <!-- This is a ridiculous amount now! And is it still true?
      Does not appear to be true for version 1.46.3.  Time with tests