From 5f2ba8ce99b9e189615f9ae975e9ea1b902173de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xi Ruoyao Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 22:09:17 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] gcc: Decorate test failures, remove outdated comments, ... move comments for upstream PR links to correct location. BTW data-model-4.c is also in analyzer directory, so we can just say 7 analyzer tests. --- chapter08/gcc.xml | 44 +++++++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/chapter08/gcc.xml b/chapter08/gcc.xml index b97b0b8cc..66f803273 100644 --- a/chapter08/gcc.xml +++ b/chapter08/gcc.xml @@ -172,48 +172,30 @@ su tester -c "PATH=$PATH make -k check" url="&test-results;"/> and . - - - Eight gcc tests (out of over 185,000), data-model-4.c, pr56837.c, - and six "analyzer" tests are known to fail. + + Eight gcc tests (out of over 185,000): + pr56837.c + and seven tests in the analyzer + directory are known to fail. - One libstdc++ test (out of over 15000), copy.cc, is known to fail. + + One libstdc++ test (out of over 15000), copy.cc, is + known to fail. - For g++, 21 tests (out of approximately 250,000), 14 "AddressSanitizer*" - tests and 7 interception-malloc-test-1.C tests, are known to fail. + For g++, 21 tests (out of approximately 250,000): 14 + AddressSanitizer* + tests and 7 interception-malloc-test-1.C tests, are + known to fail. Additionally, several tests in the vect directory are known to fail if the hardware does not support AVX. - + A few unexpected failures cannot always be avoided. The GCC developers are usually aware of these issues, but have not resolved them yet. Unless the test results are vastly different from those at the above URL, it is safe to continue. - - Install the package: make install