mirror of
https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD.git
synced 2025-03-09 23:50:25 +00:00
(svn r11929) -Fix (r9981)[FS#1624]: [autoreplace] fixed a case where a single headed locomotive caused an assert when being replaced to a dualheaded one
This triggered if the player had enough money to replace and refit one of them but not enough to refit the last one as well
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f6ee3a4a1
commit
e91230415d
@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
|
||||
#include "functions.h"
|
||||
#include "variables.h"
|
||||
#include "autoreplace_func.h"
|
||||
#include "articulated_vehicles.h"
|
||||
|
||||
#include "table/strings.h"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -175,7 +176,10 @@ static CommandCost ReplaceVehicle(Vehicle **w, byte flags, Money total_cost)
|
||||
if (replacement_cargo_type != CT_NO_REFIT) {
|
||||
/* add refit cost */
|
||||
CommandCost refit_cost = GetRefitCost(new_engine_type);
|
||||
if (old_v->type == VEH_TRAIN && IsMultiheaded(old_v)) refit_cost.AddCost(refit_cost); // pay for both ends
|
||||
if (old_v->type == VEH_TRAIN && RailVehInfo(new_engine_type)->railveh_type == RAILVEH_MULTIHEAD) {
|
||||
/* Since it's a dualheaded engine we have to pay once more because the rear end is being refitted too. */
|
||||
refit_cost.AddCost(refit_cost);
|
||||
}
|
||||
cost.AddCost(refit_cost);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user