Codechange: use -fno-strict-enums instead of -fno-tree-vrp (#13369)

-fno-tree-vrp is essentially a GCC implementation detail which controls
a powerful source of optimisation information. The linked GCC bug from 2010(!)
shows that -fno-strict-enums was added in response to the bug report, and
we can use that instead. Clang supports it too. Use that instead for both
GCC and (newly) Clang.
This commit is contained in:
Sam James 2025-01-31 19:45:14 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent 1cba62faaf
commit 4e82091f92
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View File

@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ macro(compile_flags)
# We use 'ABCD' multichar for SaveLoad chunks identifiers
-Wno-multichar
# Prevent optimisation supposing enums are in a range specified by the standard
# For details, see http://gcc.gnu.org/PR43680 and PR#5246.
-fno-strict-enums
)
# Ninja processes the output so the output from the compiler
@ -106,10 +110,6 @@ macro(compile_flags)
# about its own optimized code in some places.
"-fno-strict-overflow"
# Prevent optimisation supposing enums are in a range specified by the standard
# For details, see http://gcc.gnu.org/PR43680
"-fno-tree-vrp"
# -flifetime-dse=2 (default since GCC 6) doesn't play
# well with our custom pool item allocator
"$<$<BOOL:${LIFETIME_DSE_FOUND}>:-flifetime-dse=1>"